
Last night, Pattie and I returned to Seattle to spend the evening with two of our dearest friends who are also very committed film fans. This would be the first time that I have watched the Oscars in years, if not ever.
I enjoyed the broadcast, largely because hostess, Bonnie, was able to fast forward through the commercials. I don't think I could have seen it any other way. This was the second night in a row that I had seen television. The Oscar Awards were good, but they came in second to
Hockey Night In Canada, which I had enjoyed in our hotel room the night before.
I see a lot of film and based on last nights results, I have a lot to learn. Sandra Bullock, best actress in a leading role? That was a gagger, but I have to admit that I didn't see the movie. The previews had been enough to know that Blindside wasn't a movie for me. The clips that were shown at the Oscar's didn't convince me any differently.
Jeff Bridges, best actor in a leading role? That performance I did see. Give my vote to Colin Firth - Jeff Bridges isn't even close. There was nothing interesting about Jeff Bridges character, the script, or for that matter, the movie.
Last but not least, let me weigh in on The Hurt Locker. Along with Crazy Heart, I rated The Hurt Locker three stars out of five. It didn't work for me. In The Hurt Locker, I didn't believe the story. It seemed over-the-top, Clint Eastwood-like, over sensationalized. I'll concede to best direction, but best picture? I was glad when it was over.
If there is one thing I've learned over my years of being an avid film goer, it is that I am clearly not of main stream tastes. Mostly, Pattie and I sit in empty theaters enjoying films that few people have heard of. At the movies, we may be alone, but we are not lonely. I'll opt for a sub-titles and a better story anytime.
As a note: My two favorite films of 2009 even surprised me. Both mainstream, and both sci-fi, my picks are Star Trek and District 9.